Jamaica Star Forum - Topics on dance hall, reggae, music and much more
Top 40
 
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Feb 8th, 2010, 8:11pm
News: Error in Private Messages now fixed - Jan. 2, 2007
Home Help Search Login Register


Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print
ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS (Read 1927 times)
Imanton
God Member
*****


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 3758
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #105 - Mar 9th, 2009, 7:53pm
 
Quote from RogerWilli on Mar 9th, 2009, 2:22pm:
Not quite, you may still be misinterpreting the judicial language employed by the League of Nations ... but it's a good start. You are actually beginning to istento and read the opposing evidence ... something that Imanton fears that you will do ...
I have no such fears in that regard! however, you convieniently decided to ignore reply 68 regarding The Balfour Declaration of 1917 and it's understandings not to prejudice Palistinian and non Jewish peoples civil and religious rights? Huh
Back to top
 
 

Empty purse in head is the best bank-aspire to inspire before you expire
  IP Logged
RogerWilli
Full Member
***


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 237
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #106 - Mar 10th, 2009, 12:56am
 
Quote from Imanton on Mar 9th, 2009, 7:53pm:
Quote from RogerWilli on Mar 9th, 2009, 2:22pm:
Not quite, you may still be misinterpreting the judicial language employed by the League of Nations ... but it's a good start. You are actually beginning to istento and read the opposing evidence ... something that Imanton fears that you will do ...
I have no such fears in that regard! however, you convieniently decided to ignore reply 68 regarding The Balfour Declaration of 1917 and it's understandings not to prejudice Palistinian and non Jewish peoples civil and religious rights? :-?

 
Imanton, sorry to have missed # 68 ... but you may be getting ahead of yourself ... comparing the BEGINNING of the process with sovereign Israeli responses to outrageous Arab actions that took place afterward.
 
You infer by the above statement that some "civil and religious rights" mandated by the Balfour Declaration were compromised. So, now show us how … and then why, if necessary … the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine have been “prejudiced”.
 
While you answer that, I should remind you that the British, after the fall of the Ottoman Empire, may have interpreted that part of the Balfour Declaration to mean that 78% of the Mandate for Palestine eventually became Trans-Jordan ... or Jordan as we eventually came to know it as. "Civil and religious rights" of Arabs in Palestine are still protected there today as they were in 1922.
 
This is not rocket science .. it is clearly spelt out in maps at page 1 of 52 in the article "Mandate for Palestine; The Legal Aspects of Jewish Rights" http://www.mythsandfacts.org/Conflict/mandate_for_palestine/mandate_for_palestin e.htm  
 
Left with 22% of an original mandate, it was with astonishment that we now perceive that Arab hatred and greed STILL persisted against Israel's territory. Astonishingly, to its credit, Israel was willing in 1937 via UN Resolution 181 to GIVE UP EVEN MORE TERITORY, being interested in soverignity rather than land.
 
BUT THE GREEDY ARABS REFUSED ONCE MORE, AND MADE IT CLEAR TO THE UN AND THE WORLD THAT IT WOULD INVADE IF ISRAEL'S PARTITION WENT AHEAD. This would be impossible to believe were it not fully documented.
 
IT WAS THEN, I BELIEVE, THAT ISRAEL FINALLY WOKE UP TO THE IDEA THAT TOTAL ANNIHILATION OF JEWS (WITNESS MAHMUD AHMADINEJAD'S STATEMENT OF RECORD)  WAS ON THE MINDS OF THE ARABS IN THE MIDDLE EAST, AND THAT THEY SHOULD NOT GIVE UP ONE MORE INCH OF LAND. RESOLUTION 181 CANNOT BE RESUSCITATED. IT IS DEAD.

We will continue this in the thread ahead, but one final word.
 
I still sense that you believe that Israel today "infringes on the civil and religious rights" of Arabs still in Palestine ... but nothing could be further from the truth. IN FACT ARAB RIGHTS ARE GUARANTEED BY THE ISRAELI CONSTITUTION ... with the only caveat being subversive acts against the state.
 
This is dealt with in the post following ...
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Mar 10th, 2009, 3:00pm by RogerWilli »  
Email   IP Logged
RogerWilli
Full Member
***


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 237
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #107 - Mar 10th, 2009, 1:01am
 
A more meaningful interpretation of the will, hopes and aspirations of the Jewish people is found below:
 
“…. The State of Israel inherited the rigid system of proportional representation from the political system of the yishuv (the organized Jewish community) in mandatory times. This system was based on the zeal with which the various political parties - in which ideology and personalities played a major role - fought to preserve their independence. The justification given for the large number of parties resulting from the system was, that in a period in which major, far-reaching and rapid changes were still taking place in the population make-up as a result of immigration, it was important to enable maximal representation for various groups and opinions….
 
“…. The principle of the generality of the elections ensures the active right of every Israeli citizen, who is at least 18 years old, to vote and the right of every Israeli citizen, who is at least 21 years old, to be elected. Even though the Basic Law: The Knesset gave the legislator the power to deny the right to vote to anyone as it may see fit, the Knesset has never made use of this power….
 
“…. A party can informally add to its list bodies or personalities that are not members of the party and that are not registered themselves as a party (for example, in the elections for the fifteenth Knesset, the Unified Arab List included contenders from the Democratic Arab Party, a registered party, and individuals from the Islamic Movement, a non-registered party). The following lists may not run in the elections: A list which acts directly or indirectly against the existence of the State of Israel as the state of the Jewish people or against its democratic nature; a list which incites racism; a list which supports the armed struggle of an enemy state or a terrorist organization against the State of Israel….”
 
( http://www.knesset.gov.il/elections16/eng/about/electoral_system_eng.htm  )
 
The first paragraph, in particular, shows us that Israel is in fact the only inclusive democracy in the Middle East … and that the general conditions that made for yishuv still maintain, since their nation is still constantly under threat.  
 
NOW WHERE IN THE MIDDLE EAST ARE THE RIGHTS OF JEWS AS SOLIDLY PROTECTED AS THOSE OF ARABS ARE IN ISRAEL?
Back to top
 
 
Email   IP Logged
RogerWilli
Full Member
***


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 237
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #108 - Mar 10th, 2009, 9:08pm
 
Quote from squattaz on Mar 7th, 2009, 12:52pm:
we are talking about palestinian people vs israeli people... not hamas (only) vs israel. so bottom line is you do not care about palestinians, thus your 1-sided approach.

 
QUITE THE CONTRARY ... BUT IT IS FRIGHTENING TO SEE THAT THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE FACT THAT THE IDEA OF A "PALESTINIAN" STATE IS ONE GIGANTIC HOAX!
 
AND GULLIBLE PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF HAVE FALLEN FOR THE LIE HOOK, LINE AND SINKER ...
 
AS A MATTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, GAZA BELONGS TO ISRAEL.
 
AS A MATTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, THE WEST BANK BELONGS TO ISRAEL.

 
HAVING A TERRORIST GROUP AND A SUPPORTING POPULATION AGITATE MILITARILY FOR "RIGHTS" ON ISRAELI SOIL SHOULD INCUR THE SEVEREST ISRAELI RESPONSE.  
 
WHY HAVE THESE PEOPLE BEEN TOLERATED FOR SO LONG?
 
THE AMAZING TRUTH IS THAT JORDAN HAS REFUSED THEM. SYRIA HAS ACCOMMODATED SOME, BUT REFUSED MANY. LEBANON DOESN'T REALLY WANT THEM. SAUDI ARABIA WON'T TAKE THEM. EGYPT DOESN'T WANT THEM. IRAN USES THEM AS PAWNS... AND THEY ALL WANT THE DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL!
Back to top
 
 
Email   IP Logged
RogerWilli
Full Member
***


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 237
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #109 - Mar 10th, 2009, 11:33pm
 
1920 - Original territory assigned to the Jewish National Home

 
1922 - Final territory assigned to the Jewish National Home

 
AS A MATTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, GAZA BELONGS TO ISRAEL.
 
AS A MATTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, THE WEST BANK BELONGS TO ISRAEL.
Back to top
 
 
Email   IP Logged
Faraway
God Member
*****


I accept the
universe!

Posts: 23875
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #110 - Mar 11th, 2009, 8:33am
 
Quote from RogerWilli on Mar 10th, 2009, 11:33pm:
1920 - Original territory assigned to the Jewish National Home
http://www.mythsandfacts.org/Conflict/mandate_for_palestine/1920-mandate_for_pal estine.jpg

1922 - Final territory assigned to the Jewish National Home
http://www.mythsandfacts.org/Conflict/mandate_for_palestine/1922-mandate_for_pal estine.jpg

AS A MATTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, GAZA BELONGS TO ISRAEL.

AS A MATTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, THE WEST BANK BELONGS TO ISRAEL.

did the palestinians sign on to this?
many ex-slave descendants in the USA are still waiting for their 40 acres and a mule...cos that was the plan...
Back to top
 
 

I cannot say whether things will get better if we change; what I can say is they must change if they are to get better....
The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.
  IP Logged
RogerWilli
Full Member
***


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 237
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #111 - Mar 11th, 2009, 12:07pm
 
Quote from whatever on Mar 11th, 2009, 8:33am:
Quote from RogerWilli on Mar 10th, 2009, 11:33pm:
1920 - Original territory assigned to the Jewish National Home
http://www.mythsandfacts.org/Conflict/mandate_for_palestine/1920-mandate_for_pal estine.jpg

1922 - Final territory assigned to the Jewish National Home
http://www.mythsandfacts.org/Conflict/mandate_for_palestine/1922-mandate_for_pal estine.jpg

AS A MATTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, GAZA BELONGS TO ISRAEL.

AS A MATTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, THE WEST BANK BELONGS TO ISRAEL.

did the palestinians sign on to this?
many ex-slave descendants in the USA are still waiting for their 40 acres and a mule...cos that was the plan...

 
Needs,
 
The answer is both simple and complex ... and someone (know him?) once said "simplicity is harder than it looks".
 
Lets deal with the simple answer first ... from my perspective ...
 
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "PALESTINIAN", ONLY ARABS AND JEWS IN PALESTINE.
 
PALESTINE REFERS TO A GEOGRAPHICAL AREA, NOT A NATIONALITY OR PEOPLE.
 
IF THERE IS SUCH A THING AS A "PALESTINIAN", THEN THE JEWS MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE ARE THESE PEOPLE.
 
To the extent that the REAL issue is the truth, the purpose of these threads MUST be to educate as well. We must therefore turn from the standard anti-Israeli left-wing rhetoric and entertain some other perspectives for a moment. Doubtless this will encourage everyone to read.
 
So here’s a start in that direction for you! … courtesy of Melanie Phillips …
 
Many think, for example, that the Palestinians are the rightful inheritors not just of Gaza and the West Bank but Israel itself.
 
But this is totally false. The Jews are the only people for whom ‘Palestine’ was ever their nation state, hundreds of years before Mohammed was even born.
 
It was in recognition of that inalienable right that in the 1920s the British undertook the legally binding international obligation — never rescinded — to settle Jews in every part of Mandatory Palestine.
 
That included not just modern Israel but the West Bank and Gaza, too. Despite this, Israel is willing for the Palestinians to have their own state — as was first offered to them in 1937 — but not if its only purpose is to be a launching pad for the final destruction of its Israeli neighbour.
 
No other country on the planet has ever been expected to make suicidal concessions to its enemies even while they continue to try to destroy it. Yet that is what the world expects of Israel….

 
http://www.melaniephillips.com/articles-new/?p=636  
 
Now for the more "complex" answer ...
Back to top
 
 
Email   IP Logged
RogerWilli
Full Member
***


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 237
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #112 - Mar 11th, 2009, 1:15pm
 

 
"... Arabs, the UN and its organs, and lately the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as well, have repeatedly claimed that the Palestinians are a native people – so much so that almost everyone takes it for granted.  
 
The problem is that a stateless Palestinian people is a fabrication. The word Palestine is not even Arabic.12
 
In a report by His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the Council of the League of Nations on the administration of Palestine and Trans-Jordan for the year 1938, the British made it clear: Palestine is not a State, it is the name of a geographical area.13
 
Palestine is a name coined by the Romans around 135 CE from the name of a seagoing Aegean people who settled on the coast of Canaan in antiquity – the Philistines. The name was chosen to replace Judea, as a sign that Jewish sovereignty had been eradicated following the Jewish Revolts against Rome.
 
In the course of time, the Latin name Philistia was further bastardized into Palistina or Palestine.14 During the next 2,000 years Palestine was never an independent state belonging to any people, nor did a Palestinian people distinct from other Arabs appear during 1,300 years of Muslim hegemony in Palestine under Arab and Ottoman rule. During that rule, local Arabs were actually considered part of, and subject to, the authority of Greater Syria ( Suriyya al-Kubra).15
 
Historically, before the Arabs fabricated the concept of Palestinian peoplehood as an exclusively Arab phenomenon, no such group existed. This is substantiated in countless official British Mandate-vintage documents that speak of the Jews and the Arabs of Palestine – not Jews and Palestinians.16
 
In fact, before local Jews began calling themselves Israelis in 1948 (when the name “Israel” was chosen for the newly-established Jewish State), the term “Palestine” applied almost exclusively to Jews and the institutions founded by new Jewish immigrants in the first half of the 20th century, before the state’s independence.

 
Some examples include:
 
The Jerusalem Post, founded in 1932, was called The Palestine Post until 1948.
 
Bank Leumi L’Israel, incorporated in 1902, was called the “Anglo-Palestine Company” until 1948.
 
The Jewish Agency – an arm of the Zionist movement engaged in Jewish settlement since 1929 – was initially called the Jewish Agency for Palestine.
 
Today’s Israel Philharmonic Orchestra, founded in 1936 by German Jewish refugees who fled Nazi Germany, was originally called the “Palestine Symphony Orchestra,” composed of some 70 Palestinian Jews.17
 
The United Jewish Appeal (UJA) was established in 1939 as a merger of the United Palestine Appeal and the fund-raising arm of the Joint Distribution Committee.
 
Encouraged by their success at historical revisionism and brainwashing the world with the “Big Lie” of a Palestinian people, Palestinian Arabs have more recently begun to claim they are the descendants of the Philistines and even the Stone Age Canaanites.18  
 
Based on that myth, they can claim to have been “victimized” twice by the Jews: in the conquest of Canaan by the Israelites and again by the Israelis in modern times – a total fabrication.19 Archeologists explain that the Philistines were a Mediterranean people who settled along the coast of Canaan in 1100 BCE. They have no connection to the Arab nation, a desert people who emerged from the Arabian Peninsula.
 
As if that myth were not enough, former PLO Chairman Yasir Arafat also claimed, “Palestinian Arabs are descendants of the Jebusites,” who were displaced when King David conquered Jerusalem.
 
Arafat also argued that “Abraham was an Iraqi.” One Christmas Eve, Arafat declared that “Jesus was a Palestinian,” a preposterous claim that echoes the words of Hanan Ashrawi, a Christian Arab who, in an interview during the 1991 Madrid Conference, said: “Jesus Christ was born in my country, in my land,” and claimed that she was “the descendant of the first Christians,” disciples who spread the gospel around Bethlehem some 600 years before the Arab conquest. If her claims were true, it would be tantamount to confessing that she is a Jew!
 
Contradictions abound; Palestinian leaders claim to be descended from the Canaanites, the Philistines, the Jebusites and the first Christians. They also “hijacked” Jesus and ignored his Jewishness, at the same time claiming the Jews never were a people and never built the Holy Temples in Jerusalem...."
 
THESE CONCLUSIONS:
 
TO DENY THE EXISTENCE OF ISRAEL MEANS TO DENY THE EXISTENCE OF LEBANON, IRAQ, JORDAN AND SYRIA ... BECAUSE THEY WERE ALL FORMED BY MANDATES OF THE GREAT POWERS ... THE FRENCH MANDATE, THE BRITISH MANDATE.
 
Final point, courtesy of Eli Hertz ...
 
"... Many seem to confuse the “Mandate for Palestine” [The Trust], with the British Mandate [The Trustee]. The “Mandate for Palestine” is a League of Nations document that laid down the Jewish legal rights in Palestine. The British Mandate, on the other hand, was entrusted by the League of Nations with the responsibility to administrate the area delineated by the “Mandate for Palestine.”...."
 
Page 7/52
Mandate for Palestine: The Legal Aspects of Jewish Rights"
http://www.mythsandfacts.org/Conflict/mandate_for_palestine/mandate_for_palestin e.htm
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Mar 11th, 2009, 8:46pm by RogerWilli »  
Email   IP Logged
RogerWilli
Full Member
***


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 237
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #113 - Mar 11th, 2009, 9:16pm
 
UN RESOLUTION 181 OF 1947... ANOTHER POST-1922 PLAN TO TAKE AWAY EVEN MORE JEWISH LAND IN PALESTINE ...
 
Resolution 181 (the 1947 Partition Plan) was the last of a series of recommendations that had been drawn up over the years by the Mandator and by international commissions, plans designed to reach an historic compromise between Arabs and Jews in western Palestine. The first was in 1922 when Great Britain unilaterally partitioned Palestine. This did not satisfy the Arabs who wanted the entire country to be Arab. Resolution 181 followed such proposals as the Peel Commission (1937); the Woodhead Commission (1938); two 1946 proposals that championed a bi-national state; one proposed by the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry in April 1946 based on a single state with equal powers for Jews and Arabs; the Morrison-Grady Plan raised in July 1946 which recommended a federal state with two provinces – one Jewish, one Arab. Every scheme since 1922 was rejected by the Arab side, including decidedly pro-Arab ones because these plans recognized Jews as a nation and gave Jewish citizens of Mandate Palestine political representation.
 
The recommendation to partition Jewish Palestine

 
In a statement by the representative of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, Dr. Abba Hillel Silver, on October 1947 before the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP), he had this to say about fairness, balance, and justice:60
 
According to David Lloyd George, then British Prime Minister, the Balfour Declaration implied that the whole of Palestine, including Transjordan, should ultimately become a Jewish state. Transjordan had, nevertheless, been severed from Palestine in 1922 and had subsequently been set up as an Arab kingdom. Now a second Arab state was to be carved out of the remainder of Palestine, with the result that the Jewish National Home would represent less than one eighth of the territory originally set aside for it. Such a sacrifice should not be asked of the Jewish people.
 
Referring to the Arab States established as independent countries since the First World War, he said:
 
17,000,000 Arabs now occupied an area of 1,290,000 square miles, including all the principal Arab and Moslem centres, while Palestine, after the loss of Transjordan, was only 10,000 square miles; yet the majority plan proposed to reduce it by one half. UNSCOP proposed to eliminate Western Galilee from the Jewish State; that was an injustice and a grievous handicap to the development of the Jewish State.” 61 [italics by author].
 
NOTE WELL THE CONCLUSION OF THE BRITISH, AND SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION S/RES/ 54 (1948)  
 
The ones who sought to alter by force the settlement envisioned in Resolution 181 were the Arabs who threatened bloodshed if the UN were to adopt the Resolution:
 
The [British] Government of Palestine fear that strife in Palestine will be greatly intensified when the Mandate is terminated, and that the international status of the United Nations Commission will mean little or nothing to the Arabs in Palestine, to whom the killing of Jews now transcends all other considerations. Thus, the Commission will be faced with the problem of how to avert certain bloodshed on a very much wider scale than prevails at present. … The Arabs have made it quite clear and have told the Palestine government that they do not propose to co-operate or to assist the Commission, and that, far from it, they propose to attack and impede its work in every possible way. We have no reason to suppose that they do not mean what they say.” 59 [italics by author]  
 
http://www.mythsandfacts.org/Conflict/mandate_for_palestine/mandate_for_palestin e.htm  
 
NOW WE SEE WHY ISRAEL HAD TO DECLARE INDEPENDENCE IN 1948 ...
Back to top
 
 
Email   IP Logged
RogerWilli
Full Member
***


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 237
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #114 - Mar 15th, 2009, 9:26pm
 
Two Israeli Police Officers Killed in West Bank
 
Sunday, March 15, 2009
JERUSALEM  —  
 
Two Israeli policemen were killed by gunfire in the West Bank in what officials suspect was a Palestinian attack, Reuters reported.
 
No Palestinians claimed responsibility for the shooting, which happened in an area close to the border with Jordan under Israeli security.
 
"The main suspicion points to a nationalistic motive," police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said.
 
Security officials say the two police officers were in a car that came under fire by Palestinians. They spoke on condition of anonymity Sunday because the report was preliminary.
 
Israel has transferred some security control to Palestinian security forces in West Bank towns but controls much of the traffic that travels through the areas at checkpoints in territory that Palestinians want for a future state.
 
Israel's rescue service said it found the police vehicle upside down with one officer dead. The rescue service said efforts to revive the other failed.
 
The Associated Press contributed to this article.
Back to top
 
 
Email   IP Logged
RogerWilli
Full Member
***


I Love YaBB 2!

Posts: 237
Re: ISRAEL BLEEDS, WORLD DOES NOTHING ABOUT HAMAS
Reply #115 - Mar 17th, 2009, 7:01am
 
Israeli police late Sun. inspecting the police car that was involved in a West Bank shooting attack in which two policemen were killed. (AP)
 

 
Last update - 14:20 16/03/2009                  
Police: West Bank shooting not caused by checkpoint removal
By Jonathan Lis and Anshel Pfeffer, Haaretz Correspondents
http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1071202.html  
 
 
Senior police officials say that the removal of checkpoints and the low intensity of Israel Defense Forces operations in the West Bank did not contribute to Sunday's shooting death of two traffic cops in the Jordan Valley.
 
"The IDF's activity is very extensive," said Shlomi Katbi, the commander of the West Bank police. "I don't see where one can tie the ongoing security activity and its quality with what happened Sunday evening."
 
Danny Dayan, the head of the Yesha council of West Bank settlements, said Israel's policies in the territories were to blame for the continued bloodletting.
 
"Every right-minded person knew that the policy of removing checkpoints and freeing terrorists that the outgoing government continues to force upon the IDF until its last days in office will exact a heavy price in blood," Dayan said.
 
National Union MK Uri Ariel said the attack is "an immediate indication of the price in blood for the removal of checkpoints Sunday morning in Nablus."
 
"In the next government, we will prevent such irresponsible security moves," Ariel said.
 
'Imad Mughniyeh Group' claims responsibility
 
An organization calling itself the "Imad Mughniyeh Group" early Monday claimed responsibility for a West Bank shooting attack a day earlier that killed two Israel Police officers.
 
An anonymous caller speaking on behalf of the group spoke to French news agency, AFP, Israel Radio reported.
 
The group is named for the top Hezbollah commander who was killed by a car bomb in Damascus in February 2008 that was blamed on Israel. Jerusalem denied involvement in the killing.
 
 
View Larger Map
 
The two police officers died Sunday evening from gunshot wounds sustained while on patrol near the settlement of Masu'a, in the northern West Bank.
 
Both victims were found in their vehicle suffering from critical gunshot wounds. One was pronounced dead by medics shortly after being discovered, and the other succumbed to his wounds following resuscitation efforts.
 
The two policemen have been named as David Rabinowitz and Yehezkel Ramzamker.
 
Police and rescue services were notified shortly after 8 P.M. of an apparent car accident near the Masu'a settlement and of a shooting attack in the same area. Officers who arrived on the scene found the overturned patrol car and the victims inside.
 
An Israel Police spokesman said the circumstances of the incident were still being investigated, although the main line of inquiry being pursued was that the two had been shot by one or more Palestinian gunmen.
 
According to an initial investigation, militants opened fire on the patrol car at close-range, causing the officers to lose control of the vehicle.
 
Police are also investigating the possibility that the attacker or attackers staged a flat tire and then shot the officers at close range when they stopped to help.
 
"The two had been killed by gunshots and the main suspicion points to a nationalistic motive," police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said.
 
Masu'a is located in the Jordan Valley, just southeast of Nablus and near the major West Bank settlement of Ariel.
 
Two police officers were lightly wounded in Jerusalem 10 days ago when an Arab bulldozer driver overturned their vehicle and rammed it into a bus, before being shot by police and a taxi driver. The attacker later died of his wounds.
 
Last Wednesday, Israeli soldiers shot and killed a Palestinian youth and wounded another after firebombs were thrown at their vehicle in the West Bank.
 
In January, a 34-year-old resident of the West Bank settlement of Kochav Hashahar was seriously wounded when a gunman opened fire on his car on the highway near the settlement. Moshe Avitan, who was driving at the time, suffered wounds to his face from the shooting.

 
Israel has transferred some security control to Palestinian security forces in West Bank towns but controls much of the traffic that travels through the areas at checkpoints in territory.
Back to top
 
 
Email   IP Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print